Eyewitnesses lie. Surveillance footage is misread. Circumstantial cases fall apart under scrutiny.
Want Freedom? Ride With the Best!
Theft and burglary charges in San Bernardino County range from misdemeanor shoplifting to serious felony burglary that carries state prison time. What they all have in common is this: the prosecution must prove specific intent beyond a reasonable doubt. That means proving not just that property was taken, but that you intended to permanently deprive the owner of it at the moment the act occurred. Intent is often the most difficult element to prove — and it is frequently where these cases break down.
Theft cases also depend heavily on eyewitness identification and surveillance footage — two of the least reliable forms of evidence in the criminal justice system. Witnesses misidentify people under stress. Surveillance footage is misread by officers who have already decided who the suspect is. Circumstantial chains of evidence have gaps that reasonable jurors often refuse to fill.
At The Smalls Firm, we have defended the full spectrum of theft and burglary cases in San Bernardino County for over 20 years. From shoplifting cases that threaten a first-time offender's career to residential burglary charges that carry a strike and years in prison, we bring the same depth of analysis, the same aggressive advocacy, and the same commitment to protecting your record. Every charge deserves a full defense.
California also provides significant opportunities to keep theft convictions off your permanent record — through diversion programs for first-time offenders, civil compromise in some cases, and expungement after the fact. We explore every option and pursue the path that best protects your future.
Residential burglary — entering an inhabited dwelling with the intent to commit a crime — is first degree burglary under PC 459, a violent felony and a strike offense under California's Three Strikes law. A conviction means state prison time and a strike that follows you for life. Call (909) 501-6882 immediately if you are facing burglary charges.
Theft cases live and die on intent, identification, and evidence quality. We attack each aggressively.
Every theft offense requires proof of specific criminal intent — the intent to permanently deprive the owner of their property. This element is often more difficult to prove than it appears. A customer who forgets to pay for an item, a borrower who intended to return property, a person who genuinely believed they had a right to the property — none of these scenarios satisfy the intent element for theft. We examine exactly what happened and present every innocent explanation with force and credibility.
Surveillance footage is presented as objective evidence, but it is frequently misinterpreted. Camera angles obscure details. Low resolution makes identification uncertain. Officers who have already decided on a suspect view footage through a confirmation bias lens. We obtain and review all surveillance footage ourselves and, when necessary, retain video forensic experts who can establish that the footage does not conclusively identify our client or support the prosecution's theory of the crime.
Research consistently demonstrates that eyewitness identification is highly unreliable, particularly across racial lines, under stress, or when the witness had only brief contact with the suspect. We scrutinize how the identification was made — whether a suggestive lineup was used, whether the witness was given feedback that reinforced their choice, and whether the confidence expressed at trial matches the uncertainty the witness showed at the time of identification. Expert testimony on eyewitness reliability is a powerful tool in these cases.
California burglary requires proof that you entered a structure with the intent to commit theft or a felony inside. The intent must exist at the moment of entry — not formed afterward. We challenge both the entry element and the intent element. Did you have permission to be there? Was there clear evidence of intent at the time of entry? In commercial burglary cases especially, the intent element is frequently the prosecution's weakest point, and we exploit that weakness relentlessly.
For first-time offenders charged with certain theft offenses, California law provides pathways to avoid a conviction entirely. Civil compromise under Penal Code 1377 allows some theft charges to be dismissed if the defendant makes restitution and the victim consents. Deferred entry of judgment and informal diversion programs are also available in some counties for low-level theft offenses. We evaluate every available alternative and pursue the path that best protects your long-term record.
Many California theft offenses are wobblers — they can be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor. Grand theft under $950 became a misdemeanor under Proposition 47. We aggressively seek the misdemeanor alternative wherever the facts support it, and we fight to have felony charges reduced at sentencing even when a full acquittal is not achieved. The difference between a felony and a misdemeanor conviction is enormous for your future employment, housing, and professional licensing opportunities.
Petty theft — theft of property valued at $950 or less — is a misdemeanor punishable by up to 6 months in county jail. Shoplifting under Proposition 47 is now a specific misdemeanor offense covering retail theft under $950. While these charges may seem minor, they carry significant consequences for your record, your employment, and your professional reputation.
First-time shoplifting offenders often have access to diversion or civil compromise programs that result in dismissal. We pursue these alternatives aggressively while simultaneously building the strongest possible defense on the merits.
Grand theft — theft of property valued over $950, theft of a firearm, theft of an automobile, or theft from a person — is a wobbler that can be charged as a felony or misdemeanor. As a felony, it carries up to 3 years in state prison. Grand theft auto carries up to 3 years regardless of vehicle value.
Proposition 47 significantly changed grand theft sentencing — most non-violent grand theft by first-time offenders is now eligible for misdemeanor treatment. We evaluate every case under the post-Prop 47 landscape to determine the most favorable charging and sentencing arguments available.
First degree burglary — entering an inhabited dwelling house, vessel, trailer, or other inhabited structure with the intent to commit theft or a felony — is a violent felony and a strike offense in California. It carries 2 to 6 years in state prison with no possibility of a misdemeanor reduction. Because someone is presumed to be home, residential burglary is treated with utmost seriousness by prosecutors and judges alike.
The intent element at the time of entry is absolutely critical. We examine every fact surrounding the defendant's entry — did they have permission, was the structure truly inhabited, was the alleged criminal intent actually formed before entry — and we build the defense around those facts with surgical precision.
Second degree burglary — entering a commercial structure, vehicle, or non-inhabited building with intent to commit theft or a felony — is a wobbler. As a felony it carries up to 3 years in state prison; as a misdemeanor, up to 1 year in county jail. Commercial burglary charges are frequently based on retail theft incidents where the prosecution upgrades the charge from shoplifting to burglary, dramatically increasing the potential sentence.
We fight the upgrade from shoplifting to burglary where the facts don't support it, and we pursue misdemeanor treatment aggressively in cases where the felony charge is warranted. The difference in consequences between shoplifting and felony burglary is enormous — and that difference is often where our advocacy makes the most impact.
Robbery — the taking of property from another person, against their will, by means of force or fear — is a felony and a strike offense. First degree robbery (committed in an inhabited structure, near an ATM, or against a transit operator) carries 3 to 9 years in state prison. Second degree robbery carries 2 to 5 years. Robbery is one of the most aggressively prosecuted theft offenses because of the element of personal confrontation.
Robbery cases often turn on witness credibility and identification evidence. We attack both with everything we have. We also examine whether the alleged force or fear element is truly supported by the evidence — many cases that are charged as robbery can be reduced to grand theft when the confrontation element is closely examined.
Penal Code 496 makes it a crime to buy, receive, conceal, sell, or withhold property that you know to be stolen. It is a wobbler — as a felony it carries up to 3 years in state prison. This charge frequently arises when someone is found in possession of property that turns out to be stolen, even if they had no involvement in the actual theft.
The prosecution must prove you actually knew the property was stolen — not just that a reasonable person should have suspected it. We challenge the knowledge element aggressively and present evidence of innocent acquisition wherever it exists. Many receiving stolen property cases involve flea market purchases, online transactions, or gifts where knowledge of stolen origin is genuinely absent.
Your case review is 100% confidential. No cost, no obligation. Call now — the sooner we get involved, the more we can do to protect your record.